Abstract
Immigrants are always accused of stealing people’s jobs. Yet, by assumption, standard immigration models—the neoclassical model and Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides matching model—rule out displacement of native workers by immigrants. In these models, when immigrants enter the labor force, they are absorbed by firms without taking jobs away from native jobseekers. This paper develops a more general model of immigration, which allows for displacement of native workers by immigrants. Such generalization seems crucial to understand and study all the possible effects of immigration on labor markets. The model blends a matching framework with job rationing. In it, the entry of immigrants increases the unemployment rate of native workers. Moreover, the reduction in employment rate is sharper when the labor market is depressed because jobs are scarcer then. On the plus side, immigration makes it easier for firms to recruit, which improves firm profits. The overall effect of immigration on native welfare depends on the state of the labor market. Immigration always reduces welfare when the labor market is inefficiently slack, but some immigration improves welfare when the labor market is inefficiently tight.
Figure 6B: Impact of immigration on native unemployment in bad times
Figure 7: Optimal immigration policy over the business cycle
Citation
Michaillat, Pascal. 2023. “Modeling the Displacement of Native Workers by Immigrants.” arXiv:2303.13319v2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.13319 .
@techreport{M23,
author = {Pascal Michaillat},
year = {2023},
title = {Modeling the Displacement of Native Workers by Immigrants},
number = {arXiv:2303.13319v2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.13319}}